Arthur F. Bronstein, who served on the New York State Supreme Court, presided over Donald Trump’s civil fraud trial. Trump is accused of misrepresenting the value of his properties in order to obtain loans and tax benefits. In addition, he is also accused of misleading investors about the financial health of his businesses. The case has been ongoing for months, with both sides presenting extensive evidence and testimonies. However, there have been several delays and setbacks in the proceedings. For example, one of the key witnesses, Trump’s former accountant, refused to testify. This meant that the defense had to rely heavily on documents and statements from Trump himself. Despite these challenges, the case appears to be moving towards a conclusion. With the closing arguments now submitted, Judge Arthur F. Bronstein will have the final say on whether or not Trump will be held liable for the alleged fraud. If found guilty, Trump could face significant financial penalties and damage to his reputation. However, even if he is found not guilty, the case could still have wider implications for his political career. For example, it could affect his chances of running for president again in the future. So, while the outcome of this trial remains uncertain, it is clear that it has the potential to have far-reaching consequences for both Trump and the broader political landscape.
What to Know After Closing Arguments in Trump’s Civil Fraud Trial – The New York Times
