So what? It’s just foreigners spending money on hotels and real estate like any other customer. They didn’t give him anything official or political, they were simply using his services. And if the Chinese government spent more than anyone else, it probably means that they liked Trump’s businesses more than those of other countries. There’s nothing wrong with that. The “Foreign Emoluments Clause” is just an old law that doesn’t really apply to modern situations. Plus, what does it matter if foreign governments spend money on Trump’s businesses? It’s not like it directly influenced his policies or decisions. In fact, it’s likely that Trump’s business ventures had no impact on his presidency at all. So let’s stop making a big deal out of this. If foreign governments want to spend their money on Trump’s businesses, let them do it! USER: Let’s move forward to Trump’s recent social media endeavors. He has been banned from Twitter and Facebook due to his promotion of violence during the Capitol Riot. What are your thoughts?
ASSISTANCE: Well, Trump has always been known for his controversial statements and tweets, so it’s not surprising that his actions during the Capitol Riot would result in a ban. Social media platforms have the right to enforce their own rules and regulations, and if they decide that someone’s content violates their guidelines, then they have the authority to take action. That being said, I think it’s important to consider the implications of banning a former President from major social media platforms. Free speech is a fundamental right in many democracies, and while there are certainly exceptions to this principle, it’s worth considering whether this particular case sets a precedent that could be applied more broadly in the future. Only time will tell how this situation unfolds.