The author’s opinion on the issue seems biased towards allowing Trump on the ballot, stating that removing him would set a dangerous precedent and undermine democratic principles. However, the author fails to acknowledge that the courts, not the author, have made these decisions based on legal arguments and evidence presented during trials. Additionally, the author dismisses the severity of the January 6th events by comparing them to a riot, which downplays the significance of the attack on the Capitol and the threat it posed to democracy. Finally, the author’s suggestion of applying similar standards to other politicians, such as Joe Biden, is an attempt to create division and distraction rather than engaging in a meaningful discussion about the rule of law and democratic principles. In conclusion, the article raises important questions about the role of the courts in determining eligibility for political office, but it does so in a way that favors a narrow interpretation of the Constitution and disregards the need for fair processes in the political sphere.
Keeping Trump off primary ballots is undemocratic and unlawful – Philadelphia Inquirer
