We have profited before from putting Niall Ferguson’s findings into the context of Bitcoin, as can be read here.
You may want to read Kurt Wuckert Jr.’s “Hash war history” to get into the details of that Bitcoin hash war.
We know that war may cause a convergence of one party of war to resemble the other one.
To analyze whether we as Bitcoin SV have morphed into our enemy—the crypto cartel around BTC and other digital assets—we first have to define what they, as the enemy, are doing.
The list could go on forever, but this is enough for Bitcoin SV to check itself: are we the same, or are we becoming the same? Concerning market manipulation, BSV is delisted by most digital asset exchanges as of now and therefore could not even manipulate the general market in any noticeable way.
See? This is the osmosis of war.
In a war, winning is vital, or else you are gone.
Collaboration would be wiser then, since you have already become like the enemy, there is not as much to fight about as it was in the first place when you were not like the enemy.
If we thought about the hash war back in 2018, we saw what the enemy did.
So the weekend went exactly as I expected.
We actually had plenty of petahash offered to us; in fact, we actually didn’t have to go ask any miners or mining pools to lend us their hash.
I want you to think about the hypocrisy of that, because it’s staggering.
We could have gone into full osmosis of war at this point, becoming the enemy with all the deceptive and manipulating means and devices the enemy is using.
BTC and with it all the “crypto anarchists” out there claim to free humanity of an evil government-driven fiat money system.
What you are doing is handing over your financial freedom to a bunch of individuals who seek to capture information about you in the same way that Silicon Valley has always hoped to do.
Concerning Bitcoin SV, we have to avoid the osmosis of war.